ets 1 shrna (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Ets 1 Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ets 1 shrna/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 3 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Autoantibodies Targeting AT 1 - and ET A -Receptors Link Endothelial Proliferation and Coagulation via Ets-1 Transcription Factor"
Article Title: Autoantibodies Targeting AT 1 - and ET A -Receptors Link Endothelial Proliferation and Coagulation via Ets-1 Transcription Factor
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
doi: 10.3390/ijms23010244
Figure Legend Snippet: SRC-IgG activate Ets-1. Non-stimulated cells (Ctrl) were used as references when natural ligands were included, whereas Ctrl-IgG served as references when only IgG were used. ( a ) HMEC-1 were stimulated with AT-II, ET-1, Ctrl-IgG or SRC-IgG, with or without pre-incubation with MEK-1 inhibitor. ERK1/2 activation was measured as the pERK/α-Tubulin ratios. ( b ) Ets-1 transcriptional ( left ) and translational levels ( right ) were measured over time after stimulation with Ctrl- or SRC-IgG. ( c ) Specificity was asserted by pre-treatment with an AT 1 R or ET A R inhibitor (Valsartan or Sitaxentan, respectively), before stimulation with Ctrl- or SRC-IgG. ( d ) ( left and right ) HMEC-1 were incubated with Ctrl-IgG, natural ligands or SRC-IgG with or without pre-incubation with respective receptor blockers. ( a – d ) n = 4; representative blots are shown. * p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Endothelial cell proliferation elicited by SRC-IgG via ERK1/2–Ets-1 signaling. Non-stimulated cells (Ctrl) were used as reference when natural ligands were included, whereas Ctrl-IgG served as reference when only IgG were used. HMEC-1 were stimulated for 24 h with either natural ligands, Ctrl- or SRC-IgG, and specificity was assessed via two-hour pre-incubation with corresponding receptor inhibitors ( a ) ( left and right ) or cRaf1 inhibitor ( b ). ( c ) Abolition of Ets-1 translational regulation by shRNA following six-hour HMEC-1 stimulation. Ctrl shRNA corresponds to a mix of three control shRNA plasmids. Blots were over-exposed to better appreciate the decrease in the protein level. ( d ) Decrease in SRC-IgG induced endothelial cell proliferation by Ets-1 knockdown. ( a – c ) n = 4, ( d ) 7 ≤ n ≤ 11; representative blots are shown. * p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Incubation, shRNA
Figure Legend Snippet: Ets-1 binding to the TF promoter upon AT 1 R/ET A R stimulation by either respective natural peptide ligand or in response to SRC-IgG. ( a ) ( left and right ) Dual luciferase assay shows a TF promoter activity increase in response to either receptor-activating scenarios as compared with non-stimulated or Ctrl-IgG treated cells. ( b ) ( left and right ) Observed activation is abolished by specific AT 1 R or ET A R inhibitors. ( c ) EMSA performed with nucleus proteins of endothelial cells incubated with TF promoter DNA. Shift specificity was assessed using non-labeled DNA, the incubation with Ets-1-specific antibodies triggering a supershift. ( d ) ( left and right ) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) performed using stimulated cells, the DNA of which was precipitated with an antibody directed against Ets-1. ( a ) left, ( b , d ) n = 4, ( a ) right, ( c ) n = 3; representative blots are shown. * p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Incubation, Labeling, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Figure Legend Snippet: TF involvement in endothelial cell proliferation. Non-stimulated cells (Ctrl) were used as a reference when natural ligands were included, whereas Ctrl-IgG served as a reference when only IgG were used. ( a ) Transcriptional ( left ) and translational analysis ( right ) of TF after endothelial cell stimulation. ( b ) Specific inhibition of AT 1 R/ET A R abolishes TF activity increase. ( c ) Ets-1 knockdown abolishes TF protein synthesis. ( d ) BrdU incorporation shows that pre-incubation with a TF-blocking antibody annihilates endothelial cell proliferation elicited by SRC-IgG. ( a , c ) n = 4, ( d ), 4 ≤ n ≤ 7; representative blots are shown. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Techniques Used: Cell Stimulation, Inhibition, Activity Assay, BrdU Incorporation Assay, Incubation, Blocking Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Proposed intracellular cascade following AT 1 R and ET A R activation by SRC-IgG. Binding of SRC-IgG to the receptors triggers the activation of cRaf1, MEK, ERK1/2 and, in turn, of Ets-1, through phosphorylation of its Thr38. Once activated, Ets-1 binds to the promoter of TF, triggering its expression (mRNA and protein). This intracellular pathway results in endothelial cell proliferation, inducing obliterative vasculopathy in SSc patients.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Binding Assay, Expressing
